Of course war is part of the Alliance server. Even arranged wars can be fun in a larger player base.
But whether Admin admits it or not there is a significant difference in the gaming experience between war and suiciding/vandalism in a sequence of sets.
There's always been the problem of definition. When I began playing this was a strategy game, in which netting, warring, and diplomacy were options that could be used to capture the crown of #1 in networth. That is how the final ranks, the best players, are still determined, by final NW.
At the same time, it was always possible to force netters to war, not so in trying to force warmongers to net. So us netters try to navigate this problem through diplomacy while understanding there will be sets in which we will war.
What is galling, Slagpit, is what you don't seem to understand. Half-assed Vandalism (not war) by a particular player against a targeted tag for multiple sets. It just isn't good for the game.
And now the aggresor is telling us we will have his BS again next set. Half a year of this crap! I'm old, and may not have many half-a-years left (lol).
He says he's great at war I haven't seen it, he chickened out of a 1v1 against me, an easy netter, so why doesn't he fight the warring tags? Maybe because he's really good at being mediocre.
Last set:
Originally
posted by
Red X:
Originally
posted by
cyref:
Originally
posted by
Red X:
I am hitting you all again because I do not like you. You talk down to people and are just an all around ass.
It's not me. It's you.
I guess you could make that argument based off of the community’s opinions. You call it suiciding..I call it war. Just because I am one does not make it anything other than a war.
If you want to argue this I can round up at least 5 people and we can have a “real” war next set.
This set:
Originally
posted by
Red X:
You all do know we did not try very hard this set. Pat yourself on the back. There is always next set.
Too bad you think that's how the game is meant to be played.