Jul 8th 2011, 4:18:48
Originally posted by Jiman:
Symac, erm...
You really think that line of thought is really good in any way for netting alliances? Who do you think would outlast constant wars? A netting alliance or SOL, who have been through the worst crap you can even imagine. We have had our extreem lows, we know pain really well and we know how to last.
I highly HIGHLY suggest you rethink your frame of thought... constant war both inside and "outside" the game will end up hurting the netting alliances much much more.
You really think that line of thought is really good in any way for netting alliances? Who do you think would outlast constant wars? A netting alliance or SOL, who have been through the worst crap you can even imagine. We have had our extreem lows, we know pain really well and we know how to last.
I highly HIGHLY suggest you rethink your frame of thought... constant war both inside and "outside" the game will end up hurting the netting alliances much much more.
What choice have you left them. Hopefully more alliances step up and realize that the best thing for the server is for SoL to be disbanded or if it is what SoL wants than alliances can come together and gangbang SoL every set so the server can stabilize.
To alleviate confusion I am not saying the goal is to disband SoL or that is what is wanted. That is simply the most likely outcome. SoL can say they enjoy this set but posts by the members I have seen show something very different. I don't think SoL will agree to change and these old alliances aren't going to be pushed around as they have been for the last few years.