Oct 18th 2011, 13:30:15
How is this different from SoF's last 1a win? Oats would even admit that aponic and others were aiding him all set plus a buyout
Which is completely fine and great on him for winning..Which ever means you use to bring up your networth without cheating is fine.
I'm only using oats as my example since the thread was started by sof. Every alliance has something a rather where they gain a step up on another alliance in one way shape or form
Doing the landtrading correctly is more challenging than getting an FA shipment each day. Or having a tech ally when you're not etching. Both those other cases are always done.
If they want to take the risk it soesnt hurt anyone else and it can do well but not a well as others.
Ie last reset the top trader had 220mil net but look at all the techers that broke 300mil net.
So while ita a good strategy it isn't the best. Just find a way to bring up your country is my view. Some will try for over all win, others for avg networth, others for who has the most spies or land. It's a game, have fun :)
Which is completely fine and great on him for winning..Which ever means you use to bring up your networth without cheating is fine.
I'm only using oats as my example since the thread was started by sof. Every alliance has something a rather where they gain a step up on another alliance in one way shape or form
Doing the landtrading correctly is more challenging than getting an FA shipment each day. Or having a tech ally when you're not etching. Both those other cases are always done.
If they want to take the risk it soesnt hurt anyone else and it can do well but not a well as others.
Ie last reset the top trader had 220mil net but look at all the techers that broke 300mil net.
So while ita a good strategy it isn't the best. Just find a way to bring up your country is my view. Some will try for over all win, others for avg networth, others for who has the most spies or land. It's a game, have fun :)