Llarr, there is one thing that you are taking into account that you shouldn't be taking into account.

You assume he still would have hit you after his member hit him. If that hit wasn't done, perhaps LD was content with the amount of land he had. You have no way of knowing that he would hit you, so it doesn't matter how much land he had vs. how much he SHOULD have had.

You're predicting the future, which doesn't follow logical patterns. That is why your argument is invalid.