Nov 14th 2014, 8:49:33
Originally posted by tellarion:
Let's play a game next set, shall we? I will give you whatever time you feel is necessary to build up your country to what you consider 'good enough', and then I will break the fluff out of you. You morons keep talking about 'if you can't defend your land, then it isn't yours'. If you really think so, then take up the challenge and see how easy it is for me to break you.
So, which one of you jerkoffs wants to play ball?
PS: Yes, many people run with way too little defense. Doesn't mean your argument is correct either.
So, which one of you jerkoffs wants to play ball?
PS: Yes, many people run with way too little defense. Doesn't mean your argument is correct either.
Well that is a mute challenge. The point is not that you have enough defense that one cant do a LG (well ok to some it might be), but the real point is that you have enough defense to make doing a LG unattractive ... or in other words not efficient and worth the cost. An experienced and great player will know when its too costly to even bother doing a LG. If you have that amount of required defense you will discourage those players, sadly you wont discourage the ones like me who are not as experienced and good enough to know when not too.
Originally posted by One:
50kA and 4million turrets
vs
5kA and 3million jets
lol
vs
5kA and 3million jets
lol
Look I know, and you know that those statements about getting more def are BS, but throwing down such a challenge is just more BS to what, match their BS with.