Verified:

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 10th 2025, 21:14:32

LCN is #11
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 9th 2025, 14:04:22

Toon was one of my fav's.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 8th 2025, 2:54:12

I'm in teams:)
I am playing. I just simply wanted to share an idea I've had for a long time and RedX gave a perfect opportunity to show why it would matter.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 7th 2025, 6:23:45

Originally posted by Red X:
Originally posted by Servant:
Originally posted by Red X:
Originally posted by Servant:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
With respect to the Alliance server, I don't see anything wrong here? Monsters was hit by someone with a grudge against their tag. They successfully defended their tag and killed the aggressor. They can take pride in doing so. What should have gone differently?




Let me attempt a response.

I have always advocated, that just as coop server does this, that on alliance server, no one can leave protection, unless a member of a vetted alliance.

Said alliance should be required to have a minimum of 5 members. ( I would have said 10-15 back in the day.)

You want to start a new alliance, establish it with the server mod, as a recognized alliance. That way each and every alliance, has to take on responsibility for their members. This eliminates most of the suiciers, as they'll be know for who they are since we can now have player history and accomplishments accessible.

If you're a new person to the game, get recruited by a vetted alliance.

Let allianice be about alliance vs alliance, individual suiciders have no part of the game. That was established long ago with when RD went from untagged to tagged.

We have mechancics, we didn't have back then to enforce this,
The history of the game, shows that's how this server has evolved.
And this would be for the good of the game.


Now, a group of suiciders could all choose to band together into one alliance. Then the other alliances would have the choice to address it or ignore and hope. But then at least they have the choice, vs a single person going after a group.

with alliances being smaller it's much more difficult to take out a suicider these days. I once took out the whole top 10 in a tourney game, so a friend could win (Iris from NLS). many of our alliances are now at or less than 10. So I think this issue is even more important. LCN had an spy op teams, that would take out any suiciders, thus limiting damage to the alliance, and we often helped others like Monsters when they had suiciders. but you could that at 120 members, you can't do that at 10.

I'm just saying the history of the server argues for this, and the game mechanics are now possible. And with the smaller alliances, this is more important to address this than ever.






Suicers can go suicide in Primary, where it's all 1 v 1.



I would have just recruited the amount of players to do that. If you think I could not have done that you are delusional. Also, vetted by a mod or something like that? So if a war clan wanted to hit a netting tag because they are the same size they would be suiciding? That’s wild. I could make a 5+ member tag. Pact out the war tags, I’m friends with most of the leadership in all of them and hit you. So then what? What is your idea to get it to stop? I really have no plans to do this. I just can’t follow your logic.



Also @ papasmurf. That’s what’s up. Come back, play with them. No one is afraid of you 😘




Of course not, if some crappy group of players wanted to unite to suicide on a peaceful netting clan, then do it, and you'd probably get wiped the way imaginary numbers did when they went after Monsters years ago. (If I remember correctly, Imag got the FS, and Monsters killed 30+ Imaginary numbers members before a single monster got killed. It was almost a tag kill before imag's first kill. There's a great meme out there about it (before we knew what a meme was.)

But, you'd have a tag, and you'd be responsible to the whole server and it's poliitics.
vs an unmarked person who isn't.

And all vetting means is a 1 time, thing, you get yor intial 5 together, they're legit players, your tag is made permanent until you no longer have 5 players.

For example if I brought LCN back we'd get LCNostra vetted as our tag on a one time basis.
if after 3-4 sets we're down to 3-4 players. we lose our tag.

So then now you RedX can't leave protection unless some tag says, we'll take the chance RedX won't suicide on Monsters and if he does, we owe MOnsters the reps per our agreements.

Or you can create a war tag, and the other allainces can treat you as a normal alliance.

What you can't do is hide untagged, and hit someone,

Alliiance is for alliances (5+)
Team is for 5 or less.
Individuals can play on the individual server.

With bots being the source of land now, and not new players, this is a very easy thing to setup, as the mechanics are mostly already in place with coop.


Are you asking me to get a tag together?

You say politics, but again. None of the war tags would help you. I’d be willing to bet money you would fold before I would.


-looks at Galleri, wanna tag HS for a set, old times?



I am not.

I simply giving examples, that have occured, I haven't played allaince since the LCNreunion set. and I have no plans too. My focus is on generating NW in real life.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 6th 2025, 18:01:40

Originally posted by Red X:
Originally posted by Servant:
Originally posted by Slagpit:
With respect to the Alliance server, I don't see anything wrong here? Monsters was hit by someone with a grudge against their tag. They successfully defended their tag and killed the aggressor. They can take pride in doing so. What should have gone differently?




Let me attempt a response.

I have always advocated, that just as coop server does this, that on alliance server, no one can leave protection, unless a member of a vetted alliance.

Said alliance should be required to have a minimum of 5 members. ( I would have said 10-15 back in the day.)

You want to start a new alliance, establish it with the server mod, as a recognized alliance. That way each and every alliance, has to take on responsibility for their members. This eliminates most of the suiciers, as they'll be know for who they are since we can now have player history and accomplishments accessible.

If you're a new person to the game, get recruited by a vetted alliance.

Let allianice be about alliance vs alliance, individual suiciders have no part of the game. That was established long ago with when RD went from untagged to tagged.

We have mechancics, we didn't have back then to enforce this,
The history of the game, shows that's how this server has evolved.
And this would be for the good of the game.


Now, a group of suiciders could all choose to band together into one alliance. Then the other alliances would have the choice to address it or ignore and hope. But then at least they have the choice, vs a single person going after a group.

with alliances being smaller it's much more difficult to take out a suicider these days. I once took out the whole top 10 in a tourney game, so a friend could win (Iris from NLS). many of our alliances are now at or less than 10. So I think this issue is even more important. LCN had an spy op teams, that would take out any suiciders, thus limiting damage to the alliance, and we often helped others like Monsters when they had suiciders. but you could that at 120 members, you can't do that at 10.

I'm just saying the history of the server argues for this, and the game mechanics are now possible. And with the smaller alliances, this is more important to address this than ever.






Suicers can go suicide in Primary, where it's all 1 v 1.



I would have just recruited the amount of players to do that. If you think I could not have done that you are delusional. Also, vetted by a mod or something like that? So if a war clan wanted to hit a netting tag because they are the same size they would be suiciding? That’s wild. I could make a 5+ member tag. Pact out the war tags, I’m friends with most of the leadership in all of them and hit you. So then what? What is your idea to get it to stop? I really have no plans to do this. I just can’t follow your logic.



Also @ papasmurf. That’s what’s up. Come back, play with them. No one is afraid of you 😘




Of course not, if some crappy group of players wanted to unite to suicide on a peaceful netting clan, then do it, and you'd probably get wiped the way imaginary numbers did when they went after Monsters years ago. (If I remember correctly, Imag got the FS, and Monsters killed 30+ Imaginary numbers members before a single monster got killed. It was almost a tag kill before imag's first kill. There's a great meme out there about it (before we knew what a meme was.)

But, you'd have a tag, and you'd be responsible to the whole server and it's poliitics.
vs an unmarked person who isn't.

And all vetting means is a 1 time, thing, you get yor intial 5 together, they're legit players, your tag is made permanent until you no longer have 5 players.

For example if I brought LCN back we'd get LCNostra vetted as our tag on a one time basis.
if after 3-4 sets we're down to 3-4 players. we lose our tag.

So then now you RedX can't leave protection unless some tag says, we'll take the chance RedX won't suicide on Monsters and if he does, we owe MOnsters the reps per our agreements.

Or you can create a war tag, and the other allainces can treat you as a normal alliance.

What you can't do is hide untagged, and hit someone,

Alliiance is for alliances (5+)
Team is for 5 or less.
Individuals can play on the individual server.

With bots being the source of land now, and not new players, this is a very easy thing to setup, as the mechanics are mostly already in place with coop.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 5th 2025, 18:41:50

Originally posted by Slagpit:
With respect to the Alliance server, I don't see anything wrong here? Monsters was hit by someone with a grudge against their tag. They successfully defended their tag and killed the aggressor. They can take pride in doing so. What should have gone differently?




Let me attempt a response.

I have always advocated, that just as coop server does this, that on alliance server, no one can leave protection, unless a member of a vetted alliance.

Said alliance should be required to have a minimum of 5 members. ( I would have said 10-15 back in the day.)

You want to start a new alliance, establish it with the server mod, as a recognized alliance. That way each and every alliance, has to take on responsibility for their members. This eliminates most of the suiciers, as they'll be know for who they are since we can now have player history and accomplishments accessible.

If you're a new person to the game, get recruited by a vetted alliance.

Let allianice be about alliance vs alliance, individual suiciders have no part of the game. That was established long ago with when RD went from untagged to tagged.

We have mechancics, we didn't have back then to enforce this,
The history of the game, shows that's how this server has evolved.
And this would be for the good of the game.


Now, a group of suiciders could all choose to band together into one alliance. Then the other alliances would have the choice to address it or ignore and hope. But then at least they have the choice, vs a single person going after a group.

with alliances being smaller it's much more difficult to take out a suicider these days. I once took out the whole top 10 in a tourney game, so a friend could win (Iris from NLS). many of our alliances are now at or less than 10. So I think this issue is even more important. LCN had an spy op teams, that would take out any suiciders, thus limiting damage to the alliance, and we often helped others like Monsters when they had suiciders. but you could that at 120 members, you can't do that at 10.

I'm just saying the history of the server argues for this, and the game mechanics are now possible. And with the smaller alliances, this is more important to address this than ever.






Suicers can go suicide in Primary, where it's all 1 v 1.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 5th 2025, 15:22:07

Please explain how 1 person, carrying and executing a multi reset grudge via suicide is healthy and good for the game.

You Can't.





Originally posted by Red X:
Originally posted by Servant:
WoW,

Carrying grudges a decade later is about as pathetic a life as I've ever seen.

That's some intense loneliness being expressed through the game in a negative way.

I do think there is a place for the game mods to say, that hey, these actions are a detriment to the game.




Nah it’s like 2-3 sets ago bruh. I was a one man tag that declared war. Excuse me for using the game mechanics to retaliate for a disagreement from a few sets ago.

FOH
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 3rd 2025, 20:34:11

WoW,

Carrying grudges a decade later is about as pathetic a life as I've ever seen.

That's some intense loneliness being expressed through the game in a negative way.

I do think there is a place for the game mods to say, that hey, these actions are a detriment to the game.

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 21st 2025, 19:13:36

Who all of the old clowns are joining?
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 21st 2025, 19:12:41

LOL hey Ninong!
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 15th 2025, 14:45:57

hmm
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 13th 2025, 20:28:14

Can't believe an inactive thread can last this long
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 12th 2025, 17:37:32

Suicidal was correct.

It was as much about growing/building an alliance, the politics, building a community as it was the game itself.

The game itself was simply a vehicle. It's not what made things great.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

May 8th 2025, 18:06:17

Empy= Iscode

There's always one.

When One leaves the game
another arrives like magic,
except it is real.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Apr 29th 2025, 19:11:51

HI,

Signed,

One of the so many.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Apr 3rd 2025, 22:14:29

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Apr 3rd 2025, 22:14:25

Especially when the room got to full, and the ICQ thread split.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Mar 14th 2025, 17:26:36

Originally posted by galleri:
Originally posted by Servant:
Galleri,

How much you willing to pay?

Oh, you think I pay?? hahaha. No. It is a fee for you to play the game. Everyone in the game knows this.
HA HA HA
ha
HA HA
HA.



I thought we were in an era of negotiations now?
Send me your best offer.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Feb 13th 2025, 18:38:25

The Cursing was epic in the 90's.

Epic games require Epic Cursing
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Feb 10th 2025, 20:16:08

So how does one become a Premium Patron and what does one benefit?
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Feb 8th 2025, 15:02:22

Also what’s the point of being a Patron if I have all these ads getting in the way of my gameplay experience?
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Feb 8th 2025, 5:14:46

Please explain
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Feb 6th 2025, 0:44:12

Galleri,

How much you willing to pay?
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jan 20th 2025, 3:33:40

Do we have something exciting happening?




Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 18th 2024, 20:09:50

A post a day
Keeps the toxicity at bay


Doing my part,
My One day a year
To keep AT
AntiToxic

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Dec 21st 2023, 23:37:50

Merry Christmas and happy holidays.

Miss playing with and competing against all my old friends and yes even my foes :)

Regards,

Servant
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 7th 2023, 13:36:18

Originally posted by DerrickICN:
Servant played for like 5 years with the bots working. Did he just notice it was life support now?

Wb kiiiing.


Actually no, I posted the same thing when they were first being discussed.



and yeah I figured it was time for my once a year snark post. This was the best I had.

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 6th 2023, 20:36:55

Good names here.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Jun 6th 2023, 20:36:06

Tell me I'm wrong.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Dec 23rd 2020, 17:52:08

In another community. I need 6-8 volunteers:)

Let me know if interested.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Nov 23rd 2020, 1:23:23

There is nothing to gain from a civil war.

Every Modern Country that has gone through one has had a devestating drop in per capita income, and a complete reduction on lifestyle as the electric grids, roads, and other systems of modern convience were destroyed.

It'd be worse here.

This whole rush to buy guns and ammo and call for a civil war, is simply based on fear.

The world is changing, and civil war won't bring back the past,
it will only destroy the future of everyone's kids and grandkids.

I think we will make it though this ok,
Social Media is amplfying it,
But there are too many people in power, who will lose power, if the above were to happen.

At some point in time, the Republican party will move back towards reclaiming the moderates, and when it does, it will align both parties into the prevention of what we are seeing publically said today. Right now the Republican Party is relying on all those who think this way for votes.

I also believe that Younger black males, and significant subsets of the hispanic population will eventually move more towards the Republican Party, and that we have already seen this begin.

As that happens it will give a second reason for the R's to move to the middle, and away from the groups pushing this apotlyptic agenda.

While I think all out civil war will be avoided, I do think we will see more OKC type event in the future, and for a while a continued increase in mass shootings, both in number and in scope.

We are in for a few bumpy decades. That is for sure. We've lanced a boil, its ugly, its going to take time to heal. But we'll be better on the other side.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Nov 12th 2020, 15:35:39

Goofy is correct,

THe fluffshow here is nothing compared to the gaslighting, cursing, coalition based vitriol of 98-99.
There is no fluffshow here in comparison.

Some of the stuff written would make Trump Blush.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Nov 11th 2020, 14:51:17

I will say we are in a dangerous time. That as a country, we've forgotten the we, and its all about me.

That we as a whole, have forgotten to what it means to sacrifice for the other.

We've gotten to spoiled.

Yes we do have anarchists on the left and supremacist's/fascists on the right. There are elements in both groups that want a civil war.
Yes, they have done a masterful job in the last 20 year, of promoting their messages via social media and other outlets in a way that cloaked their true intent.
Yes, a lot of people have bought into those messages, and slowly inched towards those radical views.



But if you ask someone, Do you want our country to be for your grandkids as it is, or a version of syria or Venezuela, most being to realize what they are saying will do to the kids and grandkids.

But being from Rural Oklahoma, I see this crazy fluff on my feeds, and its not good.

We are in a dangerous time. I think we'll come through it, but I'm not 100% certain we will.

I'm hoping that 25 years of experience in learning how to communicate online, through this game, will allow some of us on this community to help others learn how to communicate.

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 21st 2020, 17:59:52

That's a good group
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 19th 2020, 21:02:14

My 2nd favorite was in a mid-sized game.

Sigil of Omega had approached with a spreadsheet that showed a demo MB resller could do well.
No one had ever done this before.

This is the only instance where I could be accused of violating the rules. as I had to go work some church camps.

So I did commie wufbam! style race to 12k acres,
I converted to DMBR, (before theo existed.)
Sigil finished out the set, when I went to work at camp and we ended up top 5.

And the questions we got when people did ops on us were hilarious.

What are your favorite memries non alliance game related.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 19th 2020, 20:58:29

Tell me yours,

So mine was back in 2000/2001, there was a major introduction of new code/goverenments etc that led to a 6 week reset for the 1b game.

Tencho
Chump
and every top players in 1a, played 1b that set.

And yes, there were alliance members in there of the top players. Supporting them.

I hid out, I got fat, and stocked early, ending up midsized in land, but left alone. I stayed off the boards where everyone was trying to figure out who was whom. I outperformed my abilities.

and I jumped into 2nd place. (and would have finished 2nd or third). And No one knew who I was, and assumed I was someone I was not.
I got hammered with a ton of GS's all the way down to 20th.
Techno dropped land, and had his buddies nuke him dead. to win. and avoid that fate and keep the win.

It was brutal, but fun.

I won the small games, and midsized games, but that was the closest I came to winning the large game.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 10th 2020, 0:33:39

This is like a diary I'd read of a dead soldier in a video game.

If I ever build something like that, you're hired:)
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 6th 2020, 16:43:50

Hey Hawk
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Oct 6th 2020, 16:43:23

No life here.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 30th 2020, 14:42:54

Derrick and I have not seen eye to eye often.

But I will gladly say, anyone who attacks another person on this forum, for who they are, who they love, for their race, religion, politics etc....I have no respect for.

I didn't see what happened, but as a community, we need to show we've been dealing with these issues for 20+ years online and how to have a positive, community full of differences of thoughts and opinions. UNlike the world around us, that just discovered this world the last few years.

Derrick, Im' sorry for what happened.
Please go stand for yourself and others. And anytime anyone on here attacks you for it, you have an ally.

Regards,

Servant
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 26th 2020, 18:46:59

Yep
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 15th 2020, 4:17:40

TTT
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 8th 2020, 21:37:13

TTT
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 8th 2020, 16:15:49

Into his Harem

My previous addition accomplished the following

1. Most total boobage
2. The Record for Highest Average Oh?
3. The Record for Oh on a single oh ever

if you want to be part of history please reach out to me. In order to be accepted into the SIR VANT, it must be a unanimous vote. As a reminder, If any of the following statements apply to you, you may be a good fit for THE SIRVANT.

<I am Tired of getting off alone to porn Bots
<I enjoy arranged meanial tasks to make SIR VANT happy
<I am not a sensitive little fluff
<I do want to devote hours of my day to my SIR VANT
<I enjoy being told how I should play the game and being shamed.
<I am just looking for like minded people to be around.
<I would like a unique experience with different members everytime
<I enjoy trolling and fluffposting
<you enjoy a penis
<I am not offended and don't take things too personally or seriously


The Rules of Sir Vant

>Respect
>No cheating or breaking contracts


Best of luck out there

Regards,

The One and Only
The Bomb
Sir Vant

Edited By: Servant on Sep 8th 2020, 16:18:23
See Original Post
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 8th 2020, 16:08:13

A typo is what led to me getting married,

:(
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Sep 4th 2020, 3:49:56

Ninong, msg sent
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Aug 31st 2020, 17:00:05

My crazy ex Laura, lives in LA. How did you know?

I've been praying for the city ever since she moved there.
Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Aug 27th 2020, 15:18:05

I have friends in Cedar rapids

They had 100MPH winds for 45 minutes,
and a top burst of 138 I believe.

(straightline winds.)

Z is #1

Servant Game profile

Member
EE Patron
1274

Aug 23rd 2020, 3:48:43

Just because an alliance prefers to net, does not mean its not the top alliance when it comes to war.

When it comes to war, LAF is no 1. Laf has been number 1 for years. I can't remember a time since Son Goku's Leadership that LAF hasn't been the top warring alliance in the game. Someone please prove me wrong.

LAF also happens to be the best netting alliance in the game.

And as much as it pains me to say it, they're the best alliance in the history of the game.

Yes, LAF started off as a bunch of pansy ass netters. But over time they grew teeth. And under Hanlong/Son Goku, they combined the arts of diplomacy, netting, and war to become the dominant alliance.

Chevs, your poll is lacking.
I expect better of you:)
Z is #1