Nov 2nd 2011, 15:50:06
from the looks of it:
NBK got the FS last set, took out a huge amount, said it was a mediocre amount, said SF did a great counter.
Then this set NBK got FS'd , lost a mediocre amount, said it was a huge amount, and did a great CS as they had turns saved from inactivity or prepping for war with SF.
in first 12 hours, SF "FS"
SemperFi
Attacker Defender Hits Kills HPK
SemperFi NBK 14,447 70 206
Total 14,447 70 206
NBK, XI
Attacker Defender Hits Kills HPK
NBK SemperFi 3,791 23 165
Total 3,791 23 165
next comes the 24 hours stats , showing the CS + allied aid.
SemperFi
Attacker Defender Hits Kills HPK
SemperFi NBK 16,852 78 216
SemperFi XI 3,659 16 229
Total 20,511 94 218
NBK, XI
Attacker Defender Hits Kills HPK
NBK SemperFi 8,843 39 227
XI SemperFi 1,744 16 109
Total 10,587 55 192
so the 'net' loss during the FS/CS was a difference of about 40 countries. yet NBK exaggerates the difference now but last set said the difference was negligible when it was about the same. don't get me wrong, i like NBK's warring and hope to someday war them again. but it seems to me that considering how good both sides are and the true lack of craptalk here on the boards (cerberus doesnt count, does he?) i would say NBK should chalk this up to a formidable opponent, difference in size or not.