Verified:

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Oct 24th 2013, 14:51:36

Suggestion: Let medical tech help to reduce losses from attacking too

With the new bottomfeeding changes, I believe many has experienced high military losses while bottomfeeding.

Medical Tech can be more useful and if it helps to reduce attacking losses rather than just reduce defencing losses. It also creates more strategies on whether to invest in medical tech or not.

ZIP Game profile

Member
3222

Oct 24th 2013, 15:17:56

i believe it was made that way to discourage bottomfeeding
fluff your 300 Spartans fool - i have 32 of the biggest fluffed mother fluffers made of titanium !!
A brigade from Blackstreetboyz (#91) has invaded your lands! Your defenses held against the invaders and forced them away! Your military lost:1 Troops

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Oct 25th 2013, 5:06:20

Originally posted by ZIP:
i believe it was made that way to discourage bottomfeeding


Incorrect.

It was made that way to make wars longer/stretch out the wars, so that the winning side of a clan war doesn't just spiral to victory. It is meant to slow down the rate at which clan wars pull apart in TNW differences and ultimately production differences. (That is, breakers on the winning side of a war need to spend more units to break a smaller country.)

The change was entirely leveled at Alliance server, but the change also modified the player experience on solo servers.

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Oct 25th 2013, 8:27:32

How many people actually used medical tech during war? Its the most under used tech. They should be made more useful.

Suggestion 1
Reduce attacking losses rather than just reduce defencing losses

Suggestion 2
Reduce gains from attackers. So if you attack someone with high medical tech, you will gain lesser resources from GS, and lesser acres gained from the attack. Helps all-ex by deterring attackers

Suggestion 3
Increases Pop gains. Helps out with in wars when you get GSed. Pretty much you're screwed when you get GSed 100 times, you'll need to spend like 100-150 turns to recover to max production again.


Edited By: h2orich on Oct 25th 2013, 8:31:50
See Original Post

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Oct 25th 2013, 11:57:04

Originally posted by h2orich:
How many people actually used medical tech during war? Its the most under used tech. They should be made more useful.


beats me but still many times it gets bought out and then some cuss why they didn't tech it more.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Oct 25th 2013, 14:12:01

This medical tech suggestion has been made a billion times, Im not sure what the counterargument is though... seems like a good change to me
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Oct 26th 2013, 5:21:16

It only gets bought out because theres only that handful of people that techs it. You see people that research 5 turns each of every tech and puts everything on sale. Those medical tech are from these people.

Either that, or its used to abuse buy-outs. A guy techs millions of points into medical tech and placed them at $9,999 or something, then get his allies to buy them.

Cerberus Game profile

Member
EE Patron
3865

Oct 27th 2013, 18:36:32

OMG! A thread about medical tech and the big fix it's supposed to accomplish is to allow some clown to "Bottomfeed" more efficiently. LOL

That's just rich, you know. hehehehe

Why don't we leave it as is and make those scummy bottom-feeders pay for their scummy way of playing the game.

I personally ENJOY it when some scummer comes along and loses herds of military to one of my newbie allies and I get to see a copy of the news. :)

That's just great, and it should remain so. Want to equalize your losses? Attack some country in your scores list and risk that retaliation attack. LOL

I'll have to post the rest of my "Rant" on GT.

Seriosly?
I don't need anger management, people need to stop pissing me off!

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Oct 27th 2013, 21:36:09

bottomfeeders don't much care if they lose slightly more or less military since their losses aren't that big that increased production doesn't counter losses.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

blid

Member
EE Patron
9319

Oct 28th 2013, 16:51:58

Originally posted by Cerberus:
OMG! A thread about medical tech and the big fix it's supposed to accomplish is to allow some clown to "Bottomfeed" more efficiently. LOL
Actually I think the big fix is to make it less useless.
Originally posted by Mr. Titanium:
Watch your mouth boy, I have never been accused of cheating on any server nor deleted before you just did right there.

Xinhuan Game profile

Member
3728

Oct 28th 2013, 19:19:52

Originally posted by Marshal:
bottomfeeders don't much care if they lose slightly more or less military since their losses aren't that big that increased production doesn't counter losses.


Untrue for solo servers. Particularly Primary. I would buy Medical tech in an instant otherwise.

Marshal Game profile

Member
32,589

Oct 28th 2013, 20:09:46

Originally posted by Xinhuan:

Untrue for solo servers. Particularly Primary. I would buy Medical tech in an instant otherwise.


solo servers have lower humanitarians range so breaks are higher than in alliance.
Patience: Yep, I'm with ELK and Marshal.

ELKronos: Patty is more hairy.

Gallery: K at least I am to my expectations now.

LadyGrizz boobies is fine

NOW3P: Morwen is a much harsher mistress than boredom....

kemo Game profile

Member
2596

Oct 29th 2013, 4:33:40

bring back conditioning tech!!!
all praised to ra

h2orich Game profile

Member
2245

Oct 29th 2013, 8:04:33

Can always look at suggestion 2 or 3 if you feel suggestion 1 is helping bottomfeeders.