May 9th 2012, 11:38:11
Originally posted by En4cer85:
Was there a sets break inbetween this group of wars this is what i'm referring to
2009
SOL hits LAF in defense of PDM
2010
SOL hits LAF
LAF hits SOL
(i haven't looked into the archives but what were laf and pdm warring over in 2009 ?)
Either way u guys blindsided LaF,(being good allies yes) then the following set (i'm pretty sure thats how it went down) Sol started topfeeding a full netting laf (sol had less members yes) They then decided to wipe LaF out for whatever reason i don't know besides the fact that it might have looked like a challenge to them at the time as they were considerably smaller and had made sure Laf was unpacted.
Next set same scenario starts to play out again, Sol looking for war starts topfeeding a full netting mode laf with about the same numbers this time. Laf made the decision to try and even the playing field by FSing Sol so that the same scenario from the set b4 didn't play out again (which it did lol)
Thus laying the road to where we are now and the path that the server has been heading down of late.... i'm not pig headed i can see how this has come about. SoL is a warring alliance and wants to war every set. I am happy to see SoL get this but i would like to see it done on better terms with everyone.
OMAC 2009/May: SOL hits LAF in defense of PDM (The reset where SOF and SOL basically took out the server)
EE 2010/Aug: SOL hits LAF (over LAF enforcing land:land)
EE 2010/Oct: LAF hits SOL (over paranoia/revenge)
Your claims of SOL topfeeding LAF in Oct 2010 are wrong and convenient. Didn't happen.
The record is plain for all to see. Your 'account' of being hit by SOL three resets in a row is bullfluff and a falsity - please correct the record.
signatures are stupid.
Months since LaF netgained: 22
Months since LaF netgained: 22