Jun 25th 2015, 13:33:37
You kind of touched on it. It is the POTENTIAL for abuse that people are against.
Washington State had a vote after sandy hook to let sheriff’s deputies enter your house once a year in order to make sure you are storing your guns in a safe manner.
Now on paper, that looks like a good idea. it would probably lead to less accidental shootings by kids and what not, and I’m all for proper gun storage, I have a safe that costs more than my old truck that I keep my weapons in. it also helps knock down the risk of theft by unsavory individuals and having them find their way onto the streets.
But look at the potential for abuse in that policy. The slack that it gives a governing body. Don’t have time to get a warrant? Yearly gun check! There would have to be some serious restrictions on that power, and even then it could be too much.
I don’t think there needs to be a national registry for all guns, which just isn’t really feasible. What there needs to be is a national don’t sell list, which there really isn’t right now. there was a crazy old guy that set his house on fire a couple years ago right after sandy hook, and he shot at the firefighters that showed up.
That dude was on a do not sell list in his home state, he just drove one state over and got what he wanted.....
Regardless, there is no easy solution, and with the bureaucrats so deeply entrenched on this issue and the ineptitude of our government to get anything done without 1000 pages of concessions added onto any bill, I don’t have much hope for real change, just cosmetic legislation that makes the activists feel safer because responsible gun owners have to wait 3 more days to get their gun.
Edited By: mrford on Jun 25th 2015, 13:39:25
Swagger of a Chupacabra
[21:37:01] <&KILLERfluffY> when I was doing FA stuff for sof the person who gave me the longest angry rant was Mr Ford